From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lpsc-mail.in2p3.fr (lpsc-mail.in2p3.fr [134.158.40.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB570DDF1E for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 01:59:30 +1100 (EST) Received: from LPSC0173W (lpsc0173w.in2p3.fr [134.158.40.173]) by lpsc-mail.in2p3.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/In2p3) with SMTP id m32ExQ9r003169 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:59:26 +0200 Message-ID: <0d4701c894d2$24dcc3f0$f52f9e86@LPSC0173W> From: "Guillaume Dargaud" To: References: <0cf501c894cb$c73dfee0$f52f9e86@LPSC0173W> Subject: Re: ARCH=ppc vs powerpc Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:59:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sorry, although it's related to linuxppc, I intended to post this question to the buildroot mailing list. -- Guillaume Dargaud http://www.gdargaud.net/