From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FACDC433EF for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 05:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J0kMR4hcGz3c8x for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:49:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu (client-ip=93.17.235.10; helo=pegase2.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; receiver=) Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr (pegase2.c-s.fr [93.17.235.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J0kLy4WRJz2xv5 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:48:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [172.26.127.67]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J0kLs32pFz9sSM; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([172.26.127.65]) by localhost (pegase2.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JxVCKAO1sD1d; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase2.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J0kLs1yldz9sSL; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1C38B768; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id Wdy7xI6fAQoi; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.204.6] (unknown [192.168.204.6]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E018B763; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <0dc1af93-3b5f-6147-359a-33980591c73f@csgroup.eu> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 06:48:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: linux-next: runtime warnings from qemu run Content-Language: fr-FR To: Stephen Rothwell , Michael Ellerman , PowerPC References: <20211126161747.1f7795b0@canb.auug.org.au> From: Christophe Leroy In-Reply-To: <20211126161747.1f7795b0@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Le 26/11/2021 à 06:17, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : > Hi all, > > My qemu boot test (pseries_le_defconfig) produces these new messages: > > code-patching: test failed at line 444 > code-patching: test failed at line 447 > code-patching: test failed at line 450 > code-patching: test failed at line 453 > code-patching: test failed at line 456 > code-patching: test failed at line 461 > code-patching: test failed at line 466 > code-patching: test failed at line 471 > code-patching: test failed at line 476 > code-patching: test failed at line 493 > code-patching: test failed at line 533 > code-patching: test failed at line 536 > code-patching: test failed at line 539 > code-patching: test failed at line 542 > code-patching: test failed at line 545 > code-patching: test failed at line 553 > code-patching: test failed at line 558 > code-patching: test failed at line 563 > code-patching: test failed at line 568 > code-patching: test failed at line 585 > code-patching: test failed at line 605 > code-patching: test failed at line 609 > code-patching: test failed at line 618 > code-patching: test failed at line 619 > code-patching: test failed at line 620 > code-patching: test failed at line 629 > code-patching: test failed at line 630 > code-patching: test failed at line 631 > code-patching: test failed at line 640 > code-patching: test failed at line 641 > code-patching: test failed at line 650 > code-patching: test failed at line 651 > code-patching: test failed at line 661 > code-patching: test failed at line 665 > code-patching: test failed at line 675 > code-patching: test failed at line 676 > code-patching: test failed at line 677 > code-patching: test failed at line 687 > code-patching: test failed at line 688 > code-patching: test failed at line 689 > code-patching: test failed at line 699 > code-patching: test failed at line 700 > code-patching: test failed at line 710 > code-patching: test failed at line 711 > > Maybe caused by commit > > 8b8a8f0ab3f5 ("powerpc/code-patching: Improve verification of patchability") Yes, Nic proposed a series to fix that: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20211126032249.1652080-1-npiggin@gmail.com/ > > As an presumably unrelated aside, we seem to be using a bit more stack > space as well > > - mount (54) used greatest stack depth: 12512 bytes left > - mount (55) used greatest stack depth: 12032 bytes left > + mount (54) used greatest stack depth: 10608 bytes left >