From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Cc: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, msuchanek@suse.de,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pseries/smp: export the smt level in the SYS FS.
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:38:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e668a82-3a3e-798a-8707-1a9b622b23b6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttxjaonc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
On 13/04/2023 15:37:59, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> There is no SMT level recorded in the kernel neither in user space.
>> Indeed there is no real constraint about that and mixed SMT levels are
>> allowed and system is working fine this way.
>>
>> However when new CPU are added, the kernel is onlining all the threads
>> which is leading to mixed SMT levels and confuse end user a bit.
>>
>> To prevent this exports a SMT level from the kernel so user space
>> application like the energy daemon, could read it to adjust their settings.
>> There is no action unless recording the value when a SMT value is written
>> into the new sysfs entry. User space applications like ppc64_cpu should
>> update the sysfs when changing the SMT level to keep the system consistent.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 3 ++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> There is a generic sysfs interface for smt in /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt
>
> I think we should be enabling that on powerpc and then adapting it to
> our needs, rather than adding a pseries specific file.
Thanks Michael, I was not aware of this sysfs interface.
> Currently the generic code is only aware of SMT on/off, so it would need
> to be taught about SMT4 and 8 at least.
Do you think we should limit our support to SMT4 and SMT8 only?
> There are already hooks in the generic code to check the SMT level when
> bringing CPUs up, see cpu_smt_allowed(), they may work for the pseries
> hotplug case too, though maybe we need some additional logic.
>
> Wiring up the basic support is pretty straight forward, something like
> the diff below.
I'll look into how to wire this up.
Thanks a lot!
> cheers
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 0f123f1f62a1..a48576f1c579 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ config PPC
> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
> select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
> + select HOTPLUG_SMT if HOTPLUG_CPU
> select HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE if PPC_BOOK3S_64 && HUGETLB_PAGE
> select IOMMU_HELPER if PPC64
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index 8a4d4f4d9749..bd23ba716d23 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -143,5 +143,8 @@ static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
> #endif
> #endif
>
> +bool topology_is_primary_thread(unsigned int cpu);
> +bool topology_smt_supported(void);
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_TOPOLOGY_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 265801a3e94c..8619609809d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1769,4 +1769,20 @@ void __noreturn arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> start_secondary_resume();
> }
>
> +/**
> + * topology_is_primary_thread - Check whether CPU is the primary SMT thread
> + * @cpu: CPU to check
> + */
> +bool topology_is_primary_thread(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpu == cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * topology_smt_supported - Check whether SMT is supported by the CPUs
> + */
> +bool topology_smt_supported(void)
> +{
> + return threads_per_core > 1;
> +}
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-31 15:39 [PATCH 0/2] Online new threads according to the current SMT level Laurent Dufour
2023-03-31 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] pseries/smp: export the smt level in the SYS FS Laurent Dufour
2023-03-31 16:05 ` Michal Suchánek
2023-04-03 8:20 ` Laurent Dufour
2023-04-13 13:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-13 15:38 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2023-04-14 12:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-14 14:38 ` Michal Suchánek
2023-04-18 17:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-03-31 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/pseries/cpuhp: respect current SMT when adding new CPU Laurent Dufour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e668a82-3a3e-798a-8707-1a9b622b23b6@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).