From: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
To: "marc. h." <heckmann@hbe.ca>
Cc: Derrik Pates <dpates@dsdk12.net>, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: jdk 1.4?
Date: 26 Feb 2002 17:19:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1014740397.870.1066.camel@tibook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020226160614.GA8235@hbe.ca>
On Die, 2002-02-26 at 17:06, marc. h. wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:00:39AM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:30AM +0100, marc. h. wrote:
> > > lack of JIT hurts though. Have you ever tried the IBM j2SDK for PPC?. It's
> > > noticeably faster on my Powerbook G3. (you can download it from IBM, just
> > > google for it.) Problem is that the IBM jvm has been broken for me since kernel
> > > 2.4.16. 2.4.15-pre1 is the last know working kernel for me. On later kernels it
> > > just keeps calling sched_yield() endlessly and burns System CPU time. I'd like
> > > to fire off an email to IBM about the problem, but don't know exactly where to
> > > fire the email off to. I use the blackdown (whose excellent work I appreciate)
> > > release now as well.
> >
> > I hadn't actually tried the IBM JVM for PPC - the only link I'd seen for
> > it pointed to some SuSE site. I am, however, running 2.4.17-benh0 on
> > this iBook, so I guess if you experience is correct, it wouldn't work on
> > here anyhow. Also, did it come with an OJI Java plugin for use with
> > Mozilla? (I'd bet not.)
>
> Would you mind giving it a shot? (or someone else?) I want to be sure that it's
> not a local Glibc issue or such thing. I also haven't tried a recent benh
> kernel..
Works here, but then I've applied a couple patches:
2.4.18-pre9-benh-o1-xfs-lolat-aa ;)
As you mention sched_yield(), the O(1) scheduler patch could make the
difference?
> you can download from: http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p
>
> only annoying thing is that you have to register for a password.
You can get it from the SuSE FTP server without that.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 18:06 jdk 1.4? R Shapiro
2002-02-26 0:22 ` Josh Rosenau
2002-02-26 2:07 ` Michel Dänzer
2002-02-26 2:16 ` Steven Hanley
2002-02-26 4:03 ` Derrik Pates
2002-02-26 10:49 ` marc. h.
2002-02-26 16:00 ` Derrik Pates
2002-02-26 16:06 ` marc. h.
2002-02-26 16:19 ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2002-02-28 13:11 ` marc. h.
2002-02-28 20:43 ` Michel Dänzer
2002-03-01 6:26 ` Derrik Pates
2002-03-01 12:48 ` Marc Heckmann
2002-02-26 16:12 ` Ryan Boder
2002-02-28 13:28 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1014740397.870.1066.camel@tibook \
--to=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=dpates@dsdk12.net \
--cc=heckmann@hbe.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).