From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Problems with AGP Apple UniNorth support in 2.4.19-pre7-ben0 kernel From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Bill Fink Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org In-Reply-To: <20020509003815.6873bbbd.billfink@mindspring.com> References: <20020424025457.7b323ff0.billfink@mindspring.com> <20020509003815.6873bbbd.billfink@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 09 May 2002 10:59:57 +0200 Message-Id: <1020934797.2414.6628.camel@tibook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 06:38, Bill Fink wrote: > > I see that the changes I suggested have been incorporated into the > 2.4.19-pre8-ben0 kernel. I was able to successfully build and boot > this kernel on my dual 500 MHz G4 (UP kernel), but the DRI was no > longer functional (as reported by glxinfo). > > I had this working with the 2.4.18-ben0 kernel, with modified versions > of drivers/char/drm/r128_{drv,state}.c that I got from a friend who I > believe got them from the XFree86 CVS at the time. That r128_state.c > is now included in the 2.4.19-pre8-ben0 kernel but the new r128_drv.c > was not included. The diff is pretty innocuous: > > 42c42 > < #define DRIVER_DATE "20010405" > --- > > #define DRIVER_DATE "20010917" > 45,46c45,46 > < #define DRIVER_MINOR 1 > < #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 6 > --- > > #define DRIVER_MINOR 2 > > #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 0 > > I figured what the heck, I didn't have anything to lose, so I went ahead > and made the change, and now the DRI is working once more! This is only valid if all of the r128 DRM is indeed 2.2 . -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/