From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: SMP/HIGHMEM/7450 status ?
From: Dan Burcaw <dburcaw@terrasoftsolutions.com>
To: Christopher Murtagh <christopher.murtagh@mcgill.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206081908120.25112-100000@blues.wcg.mcgill.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206081908120.25112-100000@blues.wcg.mcgill.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 08 Jun 2002 18:41:25 -0600
Message-Id: <1023583285.16530.17.camel@skyfox.terraplex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Chris,

I have a dual 1GHz as my primary build box w/ HIGHMEM
(1.5GB installed).. and I have had no stability problems w/
the latest 2.4.19...

-Dan

On Sat, 2002-06-08 at 17:10, Christopher Murtagh wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 benh@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
> >Xserve uses 7455 (like newer dual G4s), which doesn't seem to exhibit
> >the problem.
>
>  Does this mean that the Dual 1Ghz machines (Quicksilver) are running fine
> with HIGHMEM and SMP? Replacing the Dual 800 with one might by my only
> option, I plan on adding some services to our central machine and I'm
> worried about CPU resources. Does anyone here have one of these running?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> --
>
> Christopher Murtagh
> Webmaster / Sysadmin
> Web Communications Group
> McGill University
> Montreal, Quebec
> Canada
>
> Tel.: (514) 398-3122
> Fax:  (514) 398-2017
>
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/