* [CFT] CONFIG_ALL_PPC and post-PReP (MVME2600, etc) systems
@ 2002-11-07 19:14 Tom Rini
2002-11-07 19:49 ` Hollis Blanchard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2002-11-07 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anders Blomdell, linuxppc-dev, Hollis Blanchard
Hey all. I've just commited code to the linuxppc-2.5, linuxppc_2_4 and
linuxppc_2_4_devel trees which should fix the problem seen when a
CONFIG_ALL_PPC kernel is booted on a machine which is identified as
'prep' but lacks an MPC10x. I've tested my PowerStack, and it still
works, but I'm unsure as to:
a) Does this fix the problem seen on MVME2600? I would assume so.
b) The broken HW which caused us to go from polling to int-ack, what
host bridge was this exactly? We currently use the MPC10x-specific
address on MPC105/MPC106/MPC107 (completeness), and based on the
original comment I assume that it was MPC10x HW. Can someone confirm?
Thanks.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [CFT] CONFIG_ALL_PPC and post-PReP (MVME2600, etc) systems
2002-11-07 19:14 [CFT] CONFIG_ALL_PPC and post-PReP (MVME2600, etc) systems Tom Rini
@ 2002-11-07 19:49 ` Hollis Blanchard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hollis Blanchard @ 2002-11-07 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 13:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hey all. I've just commited code to the linuxppc-2.5, linuxppc_2_4 and
> linuxppc_2_4_devel trees which should fix the problem seen when a
> CONFIG_ALL_PPC kernel is booted on a machine which is identified as
> 'prep' but lacks an MPC10x. I've tested my PowerStack, and it still
> works, but I'm unsure as to:
> a) Does this fix the problem seen on MVME2600? I would assume so.
> b) The broken HW which caused us to go from polling to int-ack, what
> host bridge was this exactly? We currently use the MPC10x-specific
> address on MPC105/MPC106/MPC107 (completeness), and based on the
> original comment I assume that it was MPC10x HW. Can someone confirm?
Sure, it was MPC105.
-Hollis
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-07 19:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-07 19:14 [CFT] CONFIG_ALL_PPC and post-PReP (MVME2600, etc) systems Tom Rini
2002-11-07 19:49 ` Hollis Blanchard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).