Re: Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote:
>
> Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the
> wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree?  That would definitely be handy when
> trying to find where the working trees are.
>
> } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system,
> } based on the 405LP processor.  For now this is just the core support,
> } more drivers coming soon.  Are there any objections, or suggestions
> } for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel?
> }

This brings up some really good questions.  I have support for three new
platforms based on the _2_4_devel tree which I'd like to get submitted
soon [so far, I've just been following along]  So,
 * Which tree should be best for new development/ports/etc?
 * What's the best process for proposing changes?  I've seen many
   patches come along on this list, but it's not clear to me if/when
   they made it to any particular tree.

Thanks.

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |
MLB Associates              |  Consulting for the
+1 (970) 229-1963           |    Embedded world
http://www.mlbassoc.com/    |
email: <gary@mlbassoc.com>  |
gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc
------------------------------------------------------------


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/