From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Support for Arctic platform (405LP based) From: Gary Thomas To: Cort Dougan Cc: linuxppc embedded In-Reply-To: <20021212215126.V23952@duath.fsmlabs.com> References: <20021213043628.GI21319@zax.zax> <20021212215126.V23952@duath.fsmlabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 13 Dec 2002 07:26:02 -0700 Message-Id: <1039789562.7542.14781.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote: > > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when > trying to find where the working trees are. > > } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system, > } based on the 405LP processor. For now this is just the core support, > } more drivers coming soon. Are there any objections, or suggestions > } for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel? > } This brings up some really good questions. I have support for three new platforms based on the _2_4_devel tree which I'd like to get submitted soon [so far, I've just been following along] So, * Which tree should be best for new development/ports/etc? * What's the best process for proposing changes? I've seen many patches come along on this list, but it's not clear to me if/when they made it to any particular tree. Thanks. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | MLB Associates | Consulting for the +1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world http://www.mlbassoc.com/ | email: | gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/