linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>, Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: MPC5200 Patches
Date: 12 Nov 2003 08:49:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068652170.9906.439.camel@hermes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031112151824.GC31581@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>


On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> [snip]*
>
> > * Does it make sense to add a "Board uses UBoot" config option to
> >   individual boards? [BTW: the name is "U-Boot".] If we do something
> >   like this (which I'd appreciate) we should do it right - there
> >   might be some other boards that use this, too.
>
> My question is, is it possible to support both U-Boot and $(VENDOR
> FIRMWARE) in the same build?  If possible I'd like to avoid adding a
> question for any type of firmware or a define_bool based on board
> selection.  I think we allow for this on Sandpoints, so

Actually, I don't think it's possible to handle this in a general way.
In  particular, I'd also like to see a "Uses RedBoot" option, as the
booting process there is different from U-Boot, PPCBug, OF, ...  Sadly,
there is no real common ground and this truly is a target [board]
setting.

--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-01  9:36 MPC5200 Patches Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-03 23:31 ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-11-07 22:20   ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-10 19:02     ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-11-10 20:46       ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-10 21:00         ` Tom Rini
2003-11-12  0:34       ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-12  4:50         ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-11-12  9:30         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-11-12  9:49           ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-12  9:59             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-11-12 11:41               ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-11-12 11:51                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-11-12 14:47                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-12 14:45                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-12 17:43                   ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-11-12 19:41                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-11-14  6:11                       ` Kumar Gala
2003-11-14 15:20                         ` Tom Rini
2003-11-12 15:18         ` Tom Rini
2003-11-12 15:49           ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2003-11-12 15:53             ` Tom Rini
2003-11-16 20:33           ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-17  6:07             ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-11-17  8:35               ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-17 15:19                 ` Tom Rini
2003-11-17 16:02                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-17 16:25                     ` Tom Rini
2003-11-18 14:52                       ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-11-20 11:53                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-11-20 12:10                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-20 12:17                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-11-21  1:04                           ` Paul Mackerras
2003-11-18  0:43                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-11-18  0:44                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-11-18 14:45                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-18 15:00               ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-17 18:50             ` Tom Rini
2003-12-03 18:28               ` Dale Farnsworth
     [not found]                 ` <20031203185310.19A48C5F5F@atlas.denx.de>
2003-12-04  0:35                   ` Dale Farnsworth
     [not found]     ` <20031110162536.GC8584@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>
2003-11-10 19:09       ` Dale Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1068652170.9906.439.camel@hermes \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=dale@farnsworth.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).