linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guy M. Streeter" <streeter@redhat.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: /proc/sys/kernel/l2cr and the 750FX
Date: 14 Nov 2003 09:44:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068824641.18764.7.camel@jarjar.hsv.redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]

  In September I posted a version of this patch, which corrects the
formatted display of the L2CR register for 750FX processors.
Tom Rini suggested that it should use a cpu feature flag instead of the
processors version register, and also that the change might already have
been made in later kernel source.
  I have check all the 2.4.23+ and 2.6.0 source trees, and I don't see
any fix for this. I have changed the patch to use a feature flag instead
of checking the PVR. I would like to see this change considered for
inclusion.

thanks,
--Guy



[-- Attachment #2: l2cr750fx.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4544 bytes --]

--- v2.4.22_linuxppc_2_4_devel-ac4-lolat/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c	2003-07-25 14:39:48.000000000 +0000
+++ ppmc750fx/arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c	2003-10-27 22:40:46.000000000 +0000
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ struct cpu_spec	cpu_specs[] = {
     	0xffffff00, 0x70000100, "750FX",
     	CPU_FTR_SPLIT_ID_CACHE | CPU_FTR_CAN_DOZE | CPU_FTR_USE_TB |
 	CPU_FTR_L2CR | CPU_FTR_TAU | CPU_FTR_HPTE_TABLE | CPU_FTR_CAN_NAP |
-	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_NO_DPM,
+	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_NO_DPM | CPU_FTR_750FX_L2CR,
 	COMMON_PPC,
 	32, 32,
 	__setup_cpu_750
@@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ struct cpu_spec	cpu_specs[] = {
     	0xffffffff, 0x70000200, "750FX",
     	CPU_FTR_SPLIT_ID_CACHE | CPU_FTR_CAN_DOZE | CPU_FTR_USE_TB |
 	CPU_FTR_L2CR | CPU_FTR_TAU | CPU_FTR_HPTE_TABLE | CPU_FTR_CAN_NAP |
-	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS | CPU_FTR_NO_DPM,
+	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS | CPU_FTR_NO_DPM |
+	CPU_FTR_750FX_L2CR,
 	COMMON_PPC,
 	32, 32,
 	__setup_cpu_750
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ struct cpu_spec	cpu_specs[] = {
     	0xffff0000, 0x70000000, "750FX",
     	CPU_FTR_SPLIT_ID_CACHE | CPU_FTR_CAN_DOZE | CPU_FTR_USE_TB |
 	CPU_FTR_L2CR | CPU_FTR_TAU | CPU_FTR_HPTE_TABLE | CPU_FTR_CAN_NAP |
-	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS,
+	CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX | CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS | CPU_FTR_750FX_L2CR,
 	COMMON_PPC,
 	32, 32,
 	__setup_cpu_750fx
--- v2.4.22_linuxppc_2_4_devel-ac4-lolat/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_htab.c	2003-07-25 14:11:21.000000000 +0000
+++ ppmc750fx/arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_htab.c	2003-10-27 22:44:02.000000000 +0000
@@ -503,40 +503,59 @@ int proc_dol2crvec(ctl_table *table, int
 			left -= len;
 			_set_L2CR(val);
 		} else {
+			int is750fx = cur_cpu_spec[0]->cpu_features & CPU_FTR_750FX_L2CR;
 			p = buf;
 			if (!first)
 				*p++ = '\t';
 			val = _get_L2CR();
 			p += sprintf(p, "0x%08x: ", val);
-			p += sprintf(p, " L2 %s", (val >> 31) & 1 ? "enabled" :
+			p += sprintf(p, " L2 %s, ", (val >> 31) & 1 ? "enabled" :
 				     	"disabled");
-			p += sprintf(p, ", %sparity", (val>>30)&1 ? "" : "no ");
+			if (!(val>>30&1))
+				p += sprintf(p, "no ");
+			if (is750fx)
+				p += sprintf(p, "ECC checkstop");
+			else
+				p += sprintf(p, "parity");

 			/* 75x & 74x0 have different L2CR than 745x */
 			if (!(cur_cpu_spec[0]->cpu_features &
 						CPU_FTR_SPEC7450)) {
-				p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
-					sizestrings[(val >> 28) & 3]);
-				p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
-					clockstrings[(val >> 25) & 7]);
-				p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
-					typestrings[(val >> 23) & 3]);
+				if (!is750fx) {
+					p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
+						     sizestrings[(val >> 28) & 3]);
+					p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
+						     clockstrings[(val >> 25) & 7]);
+					p += sprintf(p, ", %s",
+						     typestrings[(val >> 23) & 3]);
+				}
 				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>22)&1 ?
-					", data only" : "");
-				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>20)&1 ?
-					", ZZ enabled": "");
+					     ", data only" : "");
+				if (!is750fx) {
+					p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>20)&1 ?
+						     ", ZZ enabled": "");
+				}
 				p += sprintf(p, ", %s", (val>>19)&1 ?
 					"write-through" : "copy-back");
 				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>18)&1 ?
 					", testing" : "");
-				p += sprintf(p, ", %sns hold",
-					holdstrings[(val>>16)&3]);
-				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>15)&1 ?
-					", DLL slow" : "");
-				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>14)&1 ?
-					", diff clock" :"");
-				p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>13)&1 ?
-					", DLL bypass" :"");
+				if (!is750fx) {
+					p += sprintf(p, ", %sns hold",
+						     holdstrings[(val>>16)&3]);
+					p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>15)&1 ?
+						     ", DLL slow" : "");
+					p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>14)&1 ?
+						     ", diff clock" :"");
+					p += sprintf(p, "%s", (val>>13)&1 ?
+						     ", DLL bypass" :"");
+				} else {
+					if ((val>>11)&1)
+						p += sprintf(p, ", lock way 0");
+					if ((val>>10)&1)
+						p += sprintf(p, ", lock way 1");
+					if ((val>>9)&1)
+						p += sprintf(p, ", Snoop Hit in Locked Line Error Enabled");
+				}
 			} else { /* 745x */
 				p += sprintf(p, ", %sinstn only", (val>>20)&1 ?
 					"" : "no ");
--- v2.4.22_linuxppc_2_4_devel-ac4-lolat/include/asm-ppc/cputable.h	2003-05-10 10:43:37.000000000 +0000
+++ ppmc750fx/include/asm-ppc/cputable.h	2003-10-27 22:40:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ extern struct cpu_spec		*cur_cpu_spec[];
 #define CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX		0x00004000
 #define CPU_FTR_NO_DPM			0x00008000
 #define CPU_FTR_HAS_HIGH_BATS		0x00010000
+#define CPU_FTR_750FX_L2CR		0x00020000

 #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__


             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-14 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-14 15:44 Guy M. Streeter [this message]
2003-11-14 16:27 ` /proc/sys/kernel/l2cr and the 750FX Tom Rini
2003-11-14 17:09   ` Tom Rini
2003-11-14 17:22     ` Guy M. Streeter
2003-11-21 17:22       ` 750FX and BDI2000, virtual address translation problem DONG-IN KANG
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 16:20 /proc/sys/kernel/l2cr and the 750FX Guy M. Streeter
2003-09-25 18:21 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-25 19:37   ` Guy M. Streeter
2003-09-25 23:40     ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1068824641.18764.7.camel@jarjar.hsv.redhat.com \
    --to=streeter@redhat.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).