From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: /proc/sys/kernel/l2cr and the 750FX From: "Guy M. Streeter" To: Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-embedded In-Reply-To: <20031114170930.GG13003@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> References: <1068824641.18764.7.camel@jarjar.hsv.redhat.com> <20031114162745.GE13003@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <20031114170930.GG13003@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1068830545.18764.9.camel@jarjar.hsv.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 14 Nov 2003 11:22:26 -0600 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 11:09, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:27:45AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:44:01AM -0600, Guy M. Streeter wrote: > > > > > In September I posted a version of this patch, which corrects the > > > formatted display of the L2CR register for 750FX processors. > > > Tom Rini suggested that it should use a cpu feature flag instead of the > > > processors version register, and also that the change might already have > > > been made in later kernel source. > > > I have check all the 2.4.23+ and 2.6.0 source trees, and I don't see > > > any fix for this. I have changed the patch to use a feature flag instead > > > of checking the PVR. I would like to see this change considered for > > > inclusion. > > > > I've checked this into my 2.4.24-pre tree. > > .. with a change to turn CPU_FTR_DUAL_PLL_750FX into CPU_FTR_750FX, > since that is applied to all revs of the 750FX. Cool. I had thought about doing that, and then my mind wandered off. :) --Guy ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/