From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE
From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-ppc@lauterbach.com>,
	joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
In-Reply-To: <20040204144707.GK19011@krispykreme>
References: <000501c3ea56$60935060$0a01a8c0@LUMENTIS02>
	 <6.0.2.0.2.20040203161335.035fde58@mail.lauterbach.com>
	 <1075905440.2895.23.camel@otta.rchland.ibm.com>
	 <20040204144707.GK19011@krispykreme>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1075907058.2892.29.camel@otta.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 15:58:56 -0600
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 08:47, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> A patch went into 2.6 that should fix both of these problems. Give all
> those nasty test cases another run :)

Ahh, good.  I must have blinked at the wrong time and missed it getting
merged! :-)  Do you know whether it got pushed to 2.4 as well?


Peter


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/