From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: rsync'ed sources out of date?
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
In-Reply-To: <409274FC.8040309@g-house.de>
References: <40925BBF.1010708@g-house.de>
	 <hh65bh4hgz.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de>
	 <409274FC.8040309@g-house.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1083369645.20474.197.camel@gaston>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 10:00:45 +1000
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


> despite my assumption that something "rsync'ed" would be more current, i
> shall go now with the things from kernel.org...ok.

Kernel.org for releases, or linux-2.5 rsync or Linus bk for upstream
snapshots. The idea is that people should now use the upstream tree
directly, not mine.

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/