linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
Cc: Lee Braiden <lee_b@member.fsf.org>,
	"debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org"
	<debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: SMP kernels on single processor machines
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 09:11:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085181086.8030.9.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0405211454220.26114@mag.sysgo.com>


On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 22:58, Marius Groeger wrote:

> FWIW, CONFIG_PREEMPT _does_ reduce the avarage scheduling latency.
> It's still sort of soft real-time, but the effect is measurable (I'm
> talking 2.4 kernels here, BTW) However, on desktop systems you
> probably don need to worry about this, but for an embedded system you
> may like the slightly improved reaction time.

Well... average latency is mostly meaningless, only peak latency really
matters for anything that need some sort of real time imho...

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~2004-05-21 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-20 10:58 SMP kernels on single processor machines Jens Schmalzing
2004-05-20 11:48 ` Lee Braiden
2004-05-20 23:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-21 10:34     ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-05-21 11:11       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-21 12:30     ` Lee Braiden
2004-05-21 12:58       ` Marius Groeger
2004-05-21 23:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1085181086.8030.9.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=lee_b@member.fsf.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=mgroeger@sysgo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).