From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Second version of MPC10x OCP From: Adrian Cox To: Kumar Gala Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, mgreer@mvista.com In-Reply-To: <282B6E73-C58F-11D8-9384-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> References: <1087746455.1547.23.camel@newt> <282B6E73-C58F-11D8-9384-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088078926.1372.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:36:52 +0100 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 04:32, Kumar Gala wrote: > I'm confused are we adding the OCP struct for every 10x device? Did we > get closure on the question if 105, 106 & 8240 would also work? According to the chip manuals: 107, 8240, and 8245 have the internal peripherals and should work. 105 and 106 don't have internal peripherals. mpc10x_common.c supports 106, 107, 8240, and 8245, but does not support 105. The code only adds the OCP devices if the device is not 106. My patch is slightly broken where I edited out a local board variant by hand. I'll produce a cleaned up patch based on my Sandpoint tree once I've tested it together with the 85xx I2C driver. - Adrian Cox Humboldt Solutions Ltd. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/