From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6F8DDFE3 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:40:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Htlow-0003RC-Vx for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 07:40:10 -0700 Message-ID: <10895279.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:40:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Guillaume Berthelom To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Xilinx ethernet EMAC and bad checksum? In-Reply-To: <10890962.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <10890962.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I found the answer just after send my post! I had NETIF_F_IP_CSUM in my ndev->feature -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Xilinx-ethernet-EMAC-and-bad-checksum--tf3845670.html#a10895279 Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.