From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.4 versus 2.6 patches From: David Woodhouse To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Embedded Linux PPC list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:20:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1090682408.4195.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 10:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > for most of the folks on this list, i suspect they'd be more > interested in patches to a 2.6-style Kconfig file, not a 2.4-style > config.in file, correct? Yes. The 2.4 kernel is dead. There are two classes of people -- those who are shipping 2.4 already or at least close to doing so, and those who are bringing Linux up on a new board. The former are hopefully already past the stage of being confused by such things in the config files, and the latter should most definitely be using 2.6. -- dwmw2 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/