From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: namespace issues with asm-ppc/regs.h From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala Cc: Paul Mackerras , Matt Porter , Tom Rini , linuxppc-dev list In-Reply-To: <5ADF885A-E00F-11D8-B9F8-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> References: <5ADF885A-E00F-11D8-B9F8-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090961979.18238.12.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:59:40 -0400 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 16:55, Kumar Gala wrote: > > Viro recently submitted some patches to 2.6 which removed some > names space conflicts that existed between asm-ppc/regs.h (also > asm-ppc64/regs.h) and various drivers. I'm proposing we remove all non > SPRN_ scoped references for SPRs. I'm willing to cleanup the ppc32 > side for this change, however I would appreciated someone willing to > do the same for PPC64. I wanted to do it too, but feel free to beat me on that > Let me know if we want to go down this path or if there is some other > brilliant idea for resolving the namespace issue. > > I'm also envious of Viro's ability to get C++ style comments into the > linux kernel :) -- Benjamin Herrenschmidt ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/