From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.humboldt.co.uk (mail.humboldt.co.uk [81.2.65.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9472BDEB for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:38:11 +1100 (EST) From: Adrian Cox To: Tom Rini In-Reply-To: <20041104194259.GI13456@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <1092926140.10314.101.camel@localhost> <20041104194259.GI13456@smtp.west.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1099599485.2134.59.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:18:05 +0000 Cc: mcclintock@freescale.com, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Test patch for Sandpoint X2 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 19:42, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Adrian Cox wrote: > > > The attached patch puts support for Sandpoint X2 back into Linux 2.6. > > Unlike my previous attempts, this patch detects the Sandpoint model at > > runtime. I only have an X2 here, so I would appreciate reports of the > > code being unbroken on the X3. > > [...] > Sorry for the horrific delay. I've tested this on my X3, and it works. > Can you read the Developers Certificate of Origin and follow up with a > Signed-off-by if agreeable? Thanks. Don't worry about the delay. Take the signing-off below as going with my patch of 19th August 2004. Signed-off-by: Adrian Cox - Adrian Cox