From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E2E2BF07 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:34:04 +1100 (EST) From: Jeff Angielski To: "Povolotsky, Alexander" In-Reply-To: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647439@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> References: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647439@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1104452884.13899.6.camel@nighteyes.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:28:04 -0500 Cc: linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: inflate returned FFFFFFFD - what does this error exactly mean ? List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 17:27, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > After few days of wondering through debugging (and with great help) I fixed > (by inserting watch dog resets into beginning of while loops in zlib > functions) my first problem -strange reboot failures during decompression of > the kernel image by the bootloader. > However my luck expired beyond this fix so far ... ;-). > Now I am getting "controlled" failure (during the same decompression as > described above): A quick suggestion would be try increase the load address that you are using for loading the kernel image. You might have a slight bit of overlap that is only showing up after the memory contains non-zero values. Jeff Angielski