From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org (canuck.infradead.org [205.233.218.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8035767A2C for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:45:55 +1100 (EST) From: David Woodhouse To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1106011958.4533.25.camel@gaston> References: <1106011958.4533.25.camel@gaston> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:45:44 +0000 Message-Id: <1106142344.26551.517.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc32: pmac sleep support update List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 12:32 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > This patch updates the PowerMac sleep support. The ability to sleep is now broken > into 2 different flags, one, "may sleep" is set for all motherboards that we know > how to put to sleep and wakeup. It gets turned into "can sleep" upon a call from > the video driver indicating the ability to wakeup the video card. Why do it like this? Drivers already have the ability to veto sleep requests, surely? -- dwmw2