From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6175667A8D for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:02:51 +1100 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Colin Leroy In-Reply-To: <20050127195205.192c8c28@jack.colino.net> References: <1106012932.4533.46.camel@gaston> <20050127195205.192c8c28@jack.colino.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:01:14 +1100 Message-Id: <1106866874.6250.97.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: massive update of PM code List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 19:52 +0100, Colin Leroy wrote: > On 18 Jan 2005 at 12h01, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > This patch is a quite massive update to radeonfb. It adds the ability > > to reboot from scratch the various chip models used on the recent > > powermac laptops, adds a bunch of new chips (including R420 support, > > untested), plus various fixes here or there including LCD & flat panel > > blanking, abuse of stack usage in radeonfb_set_par(), and finally, > > adapts the PM code to the recent powermac changes. > > I just upgraded to 2.6.10, applied the 6 other patches you sent and this > one. This one makes some heavy video corruption on my iBook G4 > (PowerBook6,3). The patch applies with a 27 lines offset at most hunks, > but does no rejects. > > I'm using xorg 6.7.0, and your test sleep patch #7 on 2.6.9 worked fine. > > Tell me if I can be of any help... Well, this is basically equivalent to sleep #7 patch, so I'm not sure what's wrong... Ben.