linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Murray Jensen <Murray.Jensen@csiro.au>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enhanced i2c driver for MPC8xx/MPC8260 CPM ...
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:28:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109.1022898514@msa.cmst.csiro.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 31 May 2002 07:47:25 -0700" <20020531144725.GG32412@opus.bloom.county>


On Fri, 31 May 2002 07:47:25 -0700, Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>> I think the file that includes <linux/i2c-algo-cpm.h> is expected to include
>> commproc.h, or cpm_8260.h, as required. What is the policy on these things?
>> Should every include file include all headers it needs? Anyone?
>
>IMHO, a header file should only include other things which the header
>itself needs.  eg if you do 'u8 foo;' in foo.h, add #include <asm/types.h>

OK, but should it include *all* headers it needs? If so, then the existing
<linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h> should include both <asm/8xx_immap.h> and
<asm/commproc.h> since it uses the types "i2c8xx_t" and "cpm8xx_t".

>Anything the C file needs itself, it should include, and for the sake of
>being explicit (and it's good for multi-arch drivers) if the C code does
>'u8 bar;' it should do #include <asm/types.h> too.

Agreed.

>> Should we take this discussion off the list now? Cheers!
>
>Nah..

I was referring to the discussion about the combined 8xx/8260 i2c driver
I posted. I agree - the above should stay on the list. Cheers!
								Murray...

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-01  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <M2002053110164917692@safemail.tcs-aus.com.au>
2002-05-31  1:32 ` [PATCH] enhanced i2c driver for MPC8xx/MPC8260 CPM Murray Jensen
2002-05-31 14:47   ` Tom Rini
2002-06-01  2:28     ` Murray Jensen [this message]
2002-06-03 14:23       ` Tom Rini
2002-05-31  0:09 Jeremy Rosen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-28  5:43 Murray Jensen
2002-05-28 11:01 ` Dan Malek
2002-05-28 11:39   ` Murray Jensen
2002-05-28 13:27     ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109.1022898514@msa.cmst.csiro.au \
    --to=murray.jensen@csiro.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).