linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
	Embedded PPC Linux list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:14:16 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110334456.32556.21.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107b64b01fb8e9a6c84359bb56881a6@freescale.com>

On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 19:47 -0600, Andy Fleming wrote:
> I've finally gotten all of ebs's suggestions into the PHY code.  Here 
> is the new version.  It has the following improvements:
> 
> * All PHYs now determine speed,duplex, etc using the same generic code, 
> rather than PHY-specific registers.

Some PHY are doing a better job with PHY specific registers I think ...
The gigabit for example isn't standard, and some PHYs sort-of manage to
deal with non-autoneg hubs in such a way that the "normal" aneg doesn't
succeeds, but the phy specific stuff does work. At least from stuff I've
been told a while ago, I have no direct experience here.

> * The genphy driver works for gigabit PHYs now, as well.  In theory, if 
> your PHY isn't broken in some way (I've encountered a number that are), 
> you should be able to just use genphy.

Isn't the speed reporting of gigabit an implementation specific bit in
lots of PHYs ?

> * The genphy driver now detects what features the PHY has, rather than 
> relying on arbitrarily hard-coded values
> 
> * Pause negotiation and advertising has been added
> 
> * PHY read and write functions now return errors if the bus read/write 
> functions return errors.  These errors are handled properly, and should 
> not cause any problem.  It is the bus's responsibility, however, to 
> make sure that the PHY is started again once the error is cleared.
> 
> This patch contains just the PHY code.  A later email will contain the 
> gianfar driver and 85xx patches, which will serve as an example for how 
> to use the PHY code.
> 
> A note about size:  I did some rough size comparisons, and it looks 
> like this code adds ~10 K to the binary size of the kernel (for PPC 32, 
> 85xx).  However, that's a rough estimate, since my tree includes 
> features added to the gianfar driver (eg: ethtool support for setting 
> speed/duplex).

I'll have a closer look when I find some time, see if it makes sense to
adapt sungem or not.

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-09  1:47 RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II Andy Fleming
2005-03-09  2:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-03-09  3:42   ` David S. Miller
2005-03-09  3:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-09 17:24       ` Andy Fleming
2005-03-10 23:01         ` James Chapman
2005-03-10 23:06           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-10 23:27             ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-10 23:27               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-15  0:41           ` Andy Fleming
2005-03-15 19:18             ` James Chapman
2005-03-18 23:14               ` Andy Fleming
2005-03-24 21:48               ` Andy Fleming
2005-03-25 22:56                 ` Andy Fleming
2005-03-28 23:45                   ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-29  4:11                     ` Problem when accessing variables Hiep Tran
     [not found]                 ` <42625DDB.4090600@katalix.com>
2005-05-10 17:04                   ` RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II Andy Fleming
2005-05-12  6:08                     ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-05-25 23:00                     ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-09 17:17   ` Andy Fleming
2005-05-26 18:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-26 18:45   ` Andy Fleming
2005-05-31 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-06-01 20:45   ` Andy Fleming
2005-06-01 21:19     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-06-01 22:42       ` Andy Fleming
2005-06-01 21:41     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-06-01 22:36       ` Andy Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110334456.32556.21.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).