From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: David Woodhouse To: Tom Rini In-Reply-To: <20050428153733.GD1221@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050428153733.GD1221@smtp.west.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:44:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1114796691.27227.224.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: rsync mirrors of linuxppc-* on source.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 08:37 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > With the shift away from BitKeeper, and with PowerPC work having long > shifted away from the linuxppc-* bitkeeper trees and towards a more > direct relationship with Andrew / et al, is there any value in keeping > the rsync mirrors of the last state of the linuxppc-* trees available? > > As there's no metadata, my slant is towards no. But it wouldn't be hard > to have these still exist, if people speak up. You could just convert them to git format? -- dwmw2