From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C05679F0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 16:25:35 +1000 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <7d5cfed0ee1edade8050d2c4da94b3f1@freescale.com> References: <1116222720.5095.86.camel@gaston> <7d5cfed0ee1edade8050d2c4da94b3f1@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:22:48 +1000 Message-Id: <1116224569.5095.90.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, John Reiser Subject: Re: 2GB address space limit on 32-bit PowerPC Macintosh List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I'm interested to see if Paul is aware of any other embedded port > issues, since he mentioned the problem there. Well, we need to dig out from the part of our memory containing things we don't want to have to deal with anymore things details about the booke, 4xx, 8xx, ... memory management :) > Agreed, the other problem that comes up from time to time due to > io_block_mapping() that I've see is problem with modules not working > because the kernel doesn't think it has any vmalloc() space left. How so ? Because we ioremap too much ? Well, that's an ooooold problem. ppc32 PCI code for example goes at length trying to minimize the amount of IO space mapped by PCI bridges (since IO space, unlike memory space, on our current PCI implementation is permanently mapped in). With a standard setup, we can only ioremap/vmalloc what is left between top of memory and 1Gb ... Unless you force your lowmem limit to something lower than the current limit which I think is 768Mb. > > > I'm in agreement that we should bump TASK_SIZE to 3GB and fix things, > > > how about after 2.6.12 is out? > > > > Agreed. I'll fix PReP/CHRP/pmac & defconfig. Every embedded board > > vendor/maintainer will be responsible for fixing his/her boards > > support. > > Agreed. We should probably send an email to linuxppc-embedded with a > more proper subject line to let people know. > > - kumar >