LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set cpu type explicitly, take 2
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 08:27:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116628052.5153.123.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9d0cf12aef70d985053ec7eafb0a9db@embeddededge.com>

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:30 -0400, Dan Malek wrote:
> On May 20, 2005, at 3:45 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > The problem is the same as ppc64 isn't it ?, -maltivec doesn't work 
> > with
> > -mcpu=power4 on gcc 3.4 does it ? That would mean no RAID6...
> 
> I don't understand "doesn't work."  Does power4 imply altivec?
> Do we need to add -maltivec based on the configuration option?

No, -mcpu=970 is equivalent in a way to -mcpu=power4 and -maltivec,
howevever, there is a bug in gcc 3.4 which makes -maltivec cause an
error if you have -mcpu=power4. The RAID6 code needs -maltivec. So on
gcc 3.4, we need to use -mcpu=970 instead of -mcpu=power4. However, we
must _NOT_ do that on gcc-4.0 as that causes it to implicitely generate
altivec code all over the place. (Fortunately, the bug is also fixed
there, so with gcc-4.0, we just need -mcpu=power4 and -maltivec only on
the RAID6 code)

Messy ? Yeah !

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-20 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-20  6:05 [PATCH] Set cpu type explicitly, take 2 Paul Mackerras
2005-05-20  7:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-05-20 14:30   ` Dan Malek
2005-05-20 22:27     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-05-20 14:28 ` Dan Malek
2005-05-21  0:55   ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-20 14:59 ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1116628052.5153.123.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox