From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from exchange.timesys.com (mail.timesys.com [65.117.135.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351A367A6D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:45:22 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AWdYhqJMALQmI8gPcKV9" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:33:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1119627190.28058.39.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:25:18 -0400 Message-ID: <1119627190.28058.39.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> From: "McMullan, Jason" To: Cc: PPC_LINUX Subject: PQ2FADS PCI Interrupts List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-AWdYhqJMALQmI8gPcKV9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (This is mainly for Vitaly B., but others may be interested) Given your latest MPC82xx PCI patches to the list, PCI support is *better*, but interrupts are *not* delivered on the PQ2FADS One question I have, is that it seems that on the MPC8280, at least, the PCI interrupt vector is 0x12, not the SIU_INT6=20 vectors, according to MPC8280RM.pdf, Table 4-3 on page 4-16. Vitaly, where are places in your PCI patch where you were uncertain of board differences between the PQ2FADS and the MPC8272ADS, so that I can verify those first? --=20 Jason McMullan TimeSys Corporation --=-AWdYhqJMALQmI8gPcKV9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCvCe18/0vJ5szK6kRArJcAKCR4ZrscPd4MU5PNvzoSi5v+SAQ/gCeJYI1 lk6fMJgdvyBxKdxhy/kaUOU= =qjji -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AWdYhqJMALQmI8gPcKV9--