From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5EB67FC9 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:48:26 +1000 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <76E28B16-5706-48C8-B92A-349C4F40FA76@freescale.com> References: <1124209292.3869.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <76E28B16-5706-48C8-B92A-349C4F40FA76@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:44:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1124315089.8857.41.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: When are machine checks suppose to be recoverable? List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 09:00 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > David's 8250 cleanup patch made me wondering when are machine checks > suppose to recoverable? General class of conditions is what I'm > looking for here. > > Is David's case due to some PCI master abort or something else? Might be some issue on SMP machines... Ben.