From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuuvir01.barco.com (unknown.barco.com [194.7.240.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D21C6840D for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:35:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D3A926@kuumex05.barco.com> From: "Derycke, Johan" To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:23:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5C427.7FAE9566" Subject: mpc5200 and pcmcia List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C427.7FAE9566 Content-Type: text/plain Hi all, I am working on a custom board based on the Lite5200. It is expanded with a PCI1410 PC Card Controller on the PCI bus. In the history of this list I found a patch against an older kernel version to solve some issues: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2004-December/016273.html I took the old 2.4.23 kernel and applied the patch. I could get my 3c589 network adaptor to work. Is this patch available for the current 2.4.25 kernel? Br, Johan Derycke ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C427.7FAE9566 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mpc5200 and pcmcia

Hi all,

I am working on a custom board based on the = Lite5200.
It is expanded with a PCI1410 PC Card Controller on = the PCI bus.

In the history of this list I found a patch against = an older kernel version to solve some issues:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2004-Dec= ember/016273.html

I took the old 2.4.23 kernel and applied the patch. =
I could get my 3c589 network adaptor to work.
Is this patch available for the current 2.4.25 = kernel?

Br,

Johan Derycke

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C427.7FAE9566-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA5A6841A for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:33:40 +1000 (EST) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so940902wxd for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54823def050928162638991050@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:26:21 +1000 From: Andrew Dennison To: "Derycke, Johan" In-Reply-To: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D3A926@kuumex05.barco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D3A926@kuumex05.barco.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia Reply-To: Andrew Dennison List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 9/28/05, Derycke, Johan wrote: > > I am working on a custom board based on the Lite5200. > It is expanded with a PCI1410 PC Card Controller on the PCI bus. > > In the history of this list I found a patch against an older kernel versi= on > to solve some issues: > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2004-December/016273.html > > I took the old 2.4.23 kernel and applied the patch. > I could get my 3c589 network adaptor to work. Nice to get some feedback, Your the second person that has used it. > Is this patch available for the current 2.4.25 kernel? > It will work conceptually with 2.4.25 as I'm currently running a relatively recent denx kernel with similar changes. I haven't published a recent patch yet as there wasn't much feedback last time... I've recently done some more work on this to clean it up, for example USB didn't work with that previous patch but they now coesist happily. I'll look at posting a patch soon when it's merged into my shiny new GIT tr= ee. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuuvir01.barco.com (unknown.barco.com [194.7.240.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7365C683F0 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:54:31 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> From: "Derycke, Johan" To: Andrew Dennison Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:56:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5C822.3C73D1D6" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: RE: mpc5200 and pcmcia List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C822.3C73D1D6 Content-Type: text/plain Hi Andrew, I am looking forward to your patch. If there is anything you want me to test let me know... Does it support 32bit cards? Br, Johan -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Dennison [mailto:andrewd.lists@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 29 september 2005 1:26 To: Derycke, Johan Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia On 9/28/05, Derycke, Johan wrote: > > I am working on a custom board based on the Lite5200. > It is expanded with a PCI1410 PC Card Controller on the PCI bus. > > In the history of this list I found a patch against an older kernel version > to solve some issues: > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2004-December/016273.html > > I took the old 2.4.23 kernel and applied the patch. > I could get my 3c589 network adaptor to work. Nice to get some feedback, Your the second person that has used it. > Is this patch available for the current 2.4.25 kernel? > It will work conceptually with 2.4.25 as I'm currently running a relatively recent denx kernel with similar changes. I haven't published a recent patch yet as there wasn't much feedback last time... I've recently done some more work on this to clean it up, for example USB didn't work with that previous patch but they now coesist happily. I'll look at posting a patch soon when it's merged into my shiny new GIT tree. Andrew - - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - - Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Furthermore, the company does not warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any delays. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. Thank you. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C822.3C73D1D6 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: mpc5200 and pcmcia

Hi Andrew,

I am looking forward to your patch.
If there is anything you want me to test let me = know...
Does it support 32bit cards?

Br,

Johan


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Dennison [mailto:andrewd.lists@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 29 september 2005 1:26
To: Derycke, Johan
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia

On 9/28/05, Derycke, Johan = <johan.derycke@barco.com> wrote:
>
> I am working on a custom board based on the = Lite5200.
> It is expanded with a PCI1410 PC Card = Controller on the PCI bus.
>
> In the history of this list I found a patch = against an older kernel version
> to solve some issues:
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2004-Dec= ember/016273.html
>
> I took the old 2.4.23 kernel and applied the = patch.
> I could get my 3c589 network adaptor to = work.

Nice to get some feedback, Your the second person = that has used it.

> Is this patch available for the current 2.4.25 = kernel?
>

It will work conceptually with 2.4.25 as I'm = currently running a
relatively recent denx kernel with similar changes. = I haven't
published a recent patch yet as there wasn't much = feedback last
time...

I've recently done some more work on this to clean it = up, for example
USB didn't work with that previous patch but they = now coesist happily.

I'll look at posting a patch soon when it's merged = into my shiny new GIT tree.

Andrew
- - - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - - - -
Unless indicated otherwise, the information = contained in this message is privileged and confidential, and is = intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and others = who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = distribution or copying of this message and/or attachments is strictly = prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by = any virus transmitted by this email. Furthermore, the company does not = warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor = does it accept liability for any delays. If you have received this = message in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. = Thank you.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C822.3C73D1D6-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702466844E for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:31:32 +1000 (EST) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so302523wxd for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54823def0510032131mee19acft6250ed99ce55ef21@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:31:30 +1000 From: Andrew Dennison To: "Derycke, Johan" In-Reply-To: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia Reply-To: Andrew Dennison List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/3/05, Derycke, Johan wrote: > > If there is anything you want me to test let me know... > Does it support 32bit cards? Cardbus support is a problem at the moment. Not sure if it's my hardware or a 5200 PCI configuration issue. Apparnetly it's working in 2.6 but I haven't had time to sort this out. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outmx022.isp.belgacom.be (outmx022.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5661B68402 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 16:18:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from outmx022.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx022.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j946IXq3014826 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:18:34 +0200 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <43421F87.2070501@246tNt.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 08:21:59 +0200 From: Sylvain Munaut MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Dennison References: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> <54823def0510032131mee19acft6250ed99ce55ef21@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54823def0510032131mee19acft6250ed99ce55ef21@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Andrew Dennison wrote: > On 10/3/05, Derycke, Johan wrote: > >>If there is anything you want me to test let me know... >>Does it support 32bit cards? > > > Cardbus support is a problem at the moment. Not sure if it's my > hardware or a 5200 PCI configuration issue. IIRC, there is an errata wrt configuration cycle thru bridges. > Apparnetly it's working in 2.6 but I haven't had time to sort this out. Is it ? not sure. I remember seeing a patch about it but it removed the "always 32 bit access" in all cases and not just in the needed case iirc. Make me think I forgot to sort that out ... Sylvain From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE64768352 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:11:57 +1000 (EST) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so316032wxd for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54823def0510040011m3e2ecfe6yae0d07187d5baeee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:11:56 +1000 From: Andrew Dennison To: Sylvain Munaut In-Reply-To: <43421F87.2070501@246tNt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> <54823def0510032131mee19acft6250ed99ce55ef21@mail.gmail.com> <43421F87.2070501@246tNt.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia Reply-To: Andrew Dennison List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/4/05, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > IIRC, there is an errata wrt configuration cycle thru bridges. I've got support for this (it's in my December patch). Configuration cycles work but some cardbus cards / drivers cause a TEA when the device is enabled driver loads Netgear FA511), while with a prism based WLAN card (Netcomm NP5430) I can load the firmware into the card but it doesn't run correctly - iwconfig can cause a TEA. I haven't had time to work out how to debug these properly - other more important things to do. > > > Apparnetly it's working in 2.6 but I haven't had time to sort this out. > > Is it ? not sure. I remember seeing a patch about it but it removed > the "always 32 bit access" in all cases and not just in the needed case > iirc. Make me think I forgot to sort that out ... At one stange you mentioned you had a patch from someone for cardbus support on 2.6 - it just fixed the configuration cycle errata so I assumed this meant the rest "just worked". Maybe that was a bad assumption... Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from correo.ziv.es (eu31-237.clientes.euskaltel.es [212.55.31.237]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496AB68480 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:42:52 +1000 (EST) From: "Asier Llano Palacios" To: "Andrew Dennison" In-Reply-To: <54823def0510040011m3e2ecfe6yae0d07187d5baeee@mail.gmail.com> References: <81A66F72DCACD511B0600002A551BFCB08D9613C@kuumex05.barco.com> <54823def0510032131mee19acft6250ed99ce55ef21@mail.gmail.com> <43421F87.2070501@246tNt.com> <54823def0510040011m3e2ecfe6yae0d07187d5baeee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-ZRfbe6oE0g+gwIwk0n3b" Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 09:30:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1128411035.5947.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: mpc5200 and pcmcia List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=-ZRfbe6oE0g+gwIwk0n3b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've developed the following patch. It is not tested against the last git revision (I have to update my tree as soon as I have enough time) and I sent it to Sylvain so it may be partially commited. Sorry, but this patch solves (or tries to solve) several problems. You will have to have a look at the patch manually to understand every of the issues it tries to solve. PCI bus initialization: If you boot the MPC5200 with u-boot without PCI support you will end up with some linux initialization problems. It is because of the reset process (which leaves the PCI bus in its previous state, that is reset by default, unless u-boot touches it). It does also need to initialize some configuration elements of the PCI bus. + tmp =3D in_be32(&pci_regs->scr); + tmp |=3D PCI_COMMAND_MASTER | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; + out_be32(&pci_regs->scr, tmp); and - out_be32(&pci_regs->gscr, tmp); + out_be32(&pci_regs->gscr, tmp & ~MPC52xx_PCI_GSCR_PR); Flags for hotplug: The function mpc52xx_pci_fixup_resources is called for every PCI device (included cardbus) so if it is called from cardbus it cannot be __init (it caused a big problem). Removing the __init is enough. -static void __init mpc52xx_pci_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) { +static void mpc52xx_pci_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) { Introduced Delay: A udelay(1) is introduced before configuration cycles. Otherwise it crashes for me. Sylvain told me that the PCI should wait some time after reset before it is used. I've not tested including the delay in other parts. Workaround for bug of MPC5200: MPC5200 has a bug with PCI type 1 configuration frames so the workaround proposed by freescale is splitting them. Sylvain told me that some PCI cards have problems reading or writting operations that are not 32 bits. So this code should be rewritten a little bit. (I think I should rewrite it near in the future). (This is everything else in the patch). I would thank very much to anyone that splits this patch, introduces the workaround for the bug of MPC5200 while using only 32 bit operation on type 0 frames, and sends it to Sylvain. (I feel like writting my Xmas letter to Santa. XoD). I hope this helps. Asier Llano El mar, 04-10-2005 a las 17:11 +1000, Andrew Dennison escribi=F3: > On 10/4/05, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > > > IIRC, there is an errata wrt configuration cycle thru bridges. >=20 > I've got support for this (it's in my December patch). Configuration > cycles work but some cardbus cards / drivers cause a TEA when the > device is enabled driver loads Netgear FA511), while with a prism > based WLAN card (Netcomm NP5430) I can load the firmware into the card > but it doesn't run correctly - iwconfig can cause a TEA. >=20 > I haven't had time to work out how to debug these properly - other > more important things to do. >=20 > > > > > Apparnetly it's working in 2.6 but I haven't had time to sort this = out. > > > > Is it ? not sure. I remember seeing a patch about it but it removed > > the "always 32 bit access" in all cases and not just in the needed = case > > iirc. Make me think I forgot to sort that out ... >=20 > At one stange you mentioned you had a patch from someone for cardbus > support on 2.6 - it just fixed the configuration cycle errata so I > assumed this meant the rest "just worked". Maybe that was a bad > assumption... >=20 > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded --=20 Asier Llano Palacios =20 =20 ----------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE = ------------------------------------------- This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legally = privileged.=20 It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are the only = authorized recipients. If this message has reached you in error, kindly destroy it without = review and notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your help. =B5SysCom uses virus scanning software but excludes any liability for = viruses contained in any attachment. =20 ------------------------------------ ROGAMOS LEA ESTE TEXTO = ------------------------------- Este mensaje y sus anexos pueden contener informaci=F3n confidencial y/o = con derecho legal.=20 Est=E1 dirigido =FAnicamente a la/s persona/s o entidad/es rese=F1adas = como =FAnico destinatario autorizado. Si este mensaje le hubiera llegado por error, por favor elim=EDnelo sin = revisarlo ni reenviarlo y notif=EDquelo inmediatamente al remitente. = Gracias por su colaboraci=F3n. =20 =B5SysCom utiliza software antivirus, pero no se hace responsable de los = virus contenidos en los ficheros anexos. --=-ZRfbe6oE0g+gwIwk0n3b Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mpc5200_pci.patch" Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="ISO-8859-15"; name="mpc5200_pci.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit diff -urP linux-2.6.10-mpc5200/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc52xx_pci.c linux-2.6.10-mpc5200-pci/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc52xx_pci.c --- linux-2.6.10-mpc5200/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc52xx_pci.c 2005-01-14 18:44:43.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.10-mpc5200-pci/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc52xx_pci.c 2005-02-10 09:50:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ #include +/* This macro is defined to activate the workaround for the bug + 435 of the MPC5200 (L25R) */ +#define MPC5200_BUG_435_WORKAROUND + static int mpc52xx_pci_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int offset, int len, u32 *val) @@ -39,11 +43,24 @@ (devfn << 8) | (offset & 0xfc)); - value = in_le32((u32*)hose->cfg_data); + udelay( 1 ); - if (len != 4) { - value >>= ((offset & 0x3) << 3); - value &= 0xffffffff >> (32 - (len << 3)); + switch( len ) + { + case 1: + value = in_8(((u8*)hose->cfg_data) + (offset&0x3)); + break; + case 2: + value = in_le16(((u16*)hose->cfg_data) + ((offset>>1)&1)); + break; + default: +#ifdef MPC5200_BUG_435_WORKAROUND + if( bus->number != hose->bus_offset ) + value = in_le16((u16*)hose->cfg_data) | (in_le16(((u16*)hose->cfg_data) + 1) << 16); + else +#endif + value = in_le32((u32*)hose->cfg_data); + break; } *val = value; @@ -57,7 +74,6 @@ int offset, int len, u32 val) { struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata; - u32 value, mask; if (ppc_md.pci_exclude_device) if (ppc_md.pci_exclude_device(bus->number, devfn)) @@ -69,19 +85,27 @@ (devfn << 8) | (offset & 0xfc)); - if (len != 4) { - value = in_le32((u32*)hose->cfg_data); - - offset = (offset & 0x3) << 3; - mask = (0xffffffff >> (32 - (len << 3))); - mask <<= offset; - - value &= ~mask; - val = value | ((val << offset) & mask); + switch( len ) + { + case 1: + out_8(((u8*)hose->cfg_data) + (offset&0x3), val); + break; + case 2: + out_le16(((u16*)hose->cfg_data) + ((offset>>1)&1), val); + break; + default: +#ifdef MPC5200_BUG_435_WORKAROUND + if( bus->number != hose->bus_offset ) + { + out_le16((u16*)hose->cfg_data, (u16)val); + out_le16(((u16*)hose->cfg_data) + 1, (u16)(val>>16)); + } + else +#endif + out_le32((u32*)hose->cfg_data, val); + break; } - out_le32((u32*)hose->cfg_data, val); - out_be32(hose->cfg_addr, 0); return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL; @@ -98,6 +122,9 @@ u32 tmp; /* Setup control regs */ + tmp = in_be32(&pci_regs->scr); + tmp |= PCI_COMMAND_MASTER | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; + out_be32(&pci_regs->scr, tmp); /* Setup windows */ out_be32(&pci_regs->iw0btar, MPC52xx_PCI_IWBTAR_TRANSLATION( @@ -138,10 +165,10 @@ tmp = in_be32(&pci_regs->gscr); out_be32(&pci_regs->gscr, tmp | MPC52xx_PCI_GSCR_PR); udelay(50); - out_be32(&pci_regs->gscr, tmp); + out_be32(&pci_regs->gscr, tmp & ~MPC52xx_PCI_GSCR_PR); } -static void __init mpc52xx_pci_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) { +static void mpc52xx_pci_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) { int i; /* We don't rely on boot loader for PCI and resets all --=-ZRfbe6oE0g+gwIwk0n3b--