From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baythorne.infradead.org (baythorne.infradead.org [81.187.2.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B52685D1 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:53:07 +1000 (EST) From: David Woodhouse To: Nathael PAJANI In-Reply-To: <43539813.8010809@cpe.fr> References: <43539813.8010809@cpe.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:53:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1129621982.3830.310.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Newbie... in mailing lists... List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:24 +0200, Nathael PAJANI wrote: > I tried to reply to this thread: > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-October/020555.html > But it created a new one..... not good. That's a problem with the archives; it's not your fault. If you look at the mailto: link at the top of that page, you see it looks like this: mailto:linuxppc-embedded%40ozlabs.org?Subject=eldk%203.1.1%20ramdisk%20image%20problem&In-Reply-To= Although it _attempts_ to set the In-Reply-To: header which would make your message appear to be a reply to the mail in the archive, it seems to be missing the actual message-id of that mail; it's just empty. > I tried to look for advices on posting and replying on the mailling list... > but the links given there: > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > for the rules (http://lists.linuxppc.org/rules.html) and posting > guidlines (http://lists.linuxppc.org/guidelines.html) are down. The rules are fairly much the same everywhere -- not only for mailing lists but for email in general. Try http://david.woodhou.se/email.html if you think you need to read about it, perhaps. -- dwmw2