From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baythorne.infradead.org (baythorne.infradead.org [81.187.2.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40C56869E for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:02:59 +1100 (EST) From: David Woodhouse To: Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <20051107165453.GA29111@lst.de> References: <1131357857.27347.28.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20051107160939.GD3839@smtp.west.cox.net> <1131380422.27347.72.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20051107165453.GA29111@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:02:51 +0000 Message-Id: <1131382971.27347.79.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Tom Rini , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 8250 probe on ppc32 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:54 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > What about putting that into the kernel tree so it can be built as > part of make boot. The mkzimage script? That doesn't make a lot of sense. The whole point in that is to build the zImage _separately_ from the kernel. The kernel is already capable of making the zImage by itself as part of the build process. Or do you just mean the trivial patch to make arch/ppc64/boot/ capable of loading a 32-bit kernel? That'll make sense if that code gets moved to arch/powerpc/boot, and I'll do so then. -- dwmw2