From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801F7687DE for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:31:20 +1100 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Dustin Lang In-Reply-To: References: <6A28467355D2AD478D1F51C479415AE77B47E9@MADTORMAIL.indra.es> <1133734477.6100.101.camel@gaston> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:23:56 +1100 Message-Id: <1133745837.6100.121.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , "Redondo Garcia, Roberto" Subject: Re: back trace when a SIGSEGV List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 17:20 -0800, Dustin Lang wrote: > Hi, > > > You don't need to play the cop on this list, nobody appointed you to > > that position. > > Fair enough. But do you think my reply, over all, was unreasonable?[1] I > made an attempt to answer his question, pointing out two of the most > useful resources. I also told him that his question wasn't really suited > to the list - I would have listed some better resources but I'm not > familiar with any - but I tried to write a balanced, > gentle-push-in-the-right-direction, sort of message. Re-reading the > snippet you highlighted, it does sound rude. It wasn't meant to be. > (Roberto, please accept my apologies!) The s/n ratio of this list is good enough to make such occasional questions acceptable. Ben.