From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hermes.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [12.44.186.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1A688A7 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:00:11 +1100 (EST) From: Wade Farnsworth To: Eugene Surovegin In-Reply-To: <20051207173554.GA21578@gate.ebshome.net> References: <1133968527.8299.50.camel@rhino.az.mvista.com> <20051207173554.GA21578@gate.ebshome.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1133978410.8298.85.camel@rhino.az.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 07 Dec 2005 11:00:10 -0700 Cc: linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: Transmit timeouts on 440GX Ocotea on 10baseT-HD network List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 10:35, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > Hmm, I think this should have been fixed in the latest 2.6. Check > that you tree has this patch: > > [PATCH] ibm_emac: fix graceful stop timeout handling > > It went in on 01 Dec. Although this fix assumed FDX operation for > timeouts, without collisions. Maybe I was too optimistic thinking that > nobody uses 10/HDX :). That was my first thought as well, but I've tried it with the patch, and still get the timeouts. > > Try making STOP_TIMEOUT_10 bigger, say twice as big. That doesn't seem to help any. > > If this doesn't help, I'll send you patch with enables some additional > debugging, so I can check that stop you are experiencing is the same > problem I had last month. Much appreciated. Thanks! Regards, Wade Farnsworth