From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (sipsolutions.net [66.160.135.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601EB68802 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 01:10:22 +1100 (EST) From: Johannes Berg To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <44B795CA-E338-4AAC-937D-F2EEA5E27EB9@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1134569118.3875.9.camel@localhost> <17312.38814.551675.906916@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4590.131.234.232.31.1134639886.squirrel@secure.sipsolutions.net> <44B795CA-E338-4AAC-937D-F2EEA5E27EB9@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:10:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1134655801.5787.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: illegal instructions / irqs disabled warning List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Do, 2005-12-15 at 08:04 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Out of interest, is there a reason you dont handle the emulation in > user space? I'm not even interested in emulating that at all, the kernel just checked if it could emulate it (couldn't, so my program died with SIGILL)... To tell the truth, I was just testing what would happen and wrote a buggy program. johannes