From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove device_node addrs/n_addr
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:01:35 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136239296.24205.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060102131539.GA12434@suse.de>
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 14:15 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > The pre-parsed addrs/n_addrs fields in struct device_node are finally
> > gone. Remove the dodgy heuristics that did that parsing at boot and
> > remove the fields themselves since we now have a good replacement with
> > the new OF parsing code. This patch also fixes a bunch of drivers to use
> > the new code instead, so that at least pmac32, pseries, iseries and g5
> > defconfigs build.
>
> > +++ linux-work/include/asm-powerpc/prom.h 2005-12-13 17:51:20.000000000 +1100
>
> > @@ -120,8 +82,6 @@ struct device_node {
> > char *type;
> > phandle node;
> > phandle linux_phandle;
> > - int n_addrs;
> > - struct address_range *addrs;
> > int n_intrs;
> > struct interrupt_info *intrs;
> > char *full_name;
>
> Is this patch supposed to be complete? I will find references to n_addrs
> in arch/powerpc:
>
> hydra_init, chrp_find_bridges, chrp_find_openpic, comment in
> of_finish_dynamic_node.
No, it's complete as far as powermac is concerned. I'll deal with the
remaining bits this week.
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-02 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-13 7:01 [PATCH] powerpc: Remove device_node addrs/n_addr Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-01-02 13:15 ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-02 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136239296.24205.18.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).