From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.theptrgroup.com (unknown [209.183.211.17]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D846895F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:49:59 +1100 (EST) Received: from [192.168.180.201] ([132.250.144.104]) by mail.theptrgroup.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id k04Mid507822 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:44:39 -0500 From: Jeff Angielski To: linuxppc-embedded Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:44:39 -0500 Message-Id: <1136414679.3463.10.camel@nighteyes.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: powerpc vs ppc build Reply-To: jeff@theptrgroup.com List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Is there a summary of the differences between the ppc and powerpc builds for the 2.6 kernels? Or something describing what the community, in general, is trying to fix/address with the different schemes - besides the merging of ppc and ppc64? Or how about the current status of both build architectures? It seems that people are fixing one build and breaking the other... :( Jeff Angielski The PTR Group