From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE031689C8 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:30:24 +1100 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: dtor_core@ameritech.net In-Reply-To: References: <20051225212041.GA6094@hansmi.ch> <200512252304.32830.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <1135575997.14160.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:30:06 +1100 Message-Id: <1137015006.5138.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Vojtech Pavlik , linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC?] usb/input: Add support for fn key on Apple PowerBooks List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Ok, I am looking at the patch again, and I have a question - do we > really need these 3 module parameters? If the goal is to be compatible > with older keyboards then shouldn't we stick to one behavior? I personally think one parameter is plenty enough (on/off) . Michael, can you send Dimitri the latest version of that patch please ? Ben.