From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DBF6893D for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:14:19 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC?] usb/input: Add support for fn key on Apple PowerBooks From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: dtor_core@ameritech.net In-Reply-To: References: <20051225212041.GA6094@hansmi.ch> <1137022900.5138.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060112000830.GB10142@hansmi.ch> <200601122312.05210.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <1137189319.4854.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:14:04 +1100 Message-Id: <1137190444.4854.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Vojtech Pavlik , linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Right, so do we need "no translation, fnkeyfirst and fnkeylast" option > or just "fnkeyfirst and fnkeyast"? I think "no translation" should still be around if people want to handle it entirely from userland no ? That is: - no translation : nothing special is done, Fx sends Fx keycode regardless of Fn key, Fn key itsef sends a keycode for itself, there is no emulation of numlock - fnkeyfirst / fnkeylast : Either Fx is translated and Fn-Fx is not or the opposite. Numlock emulation is enabled. > Huh? You mean 1, right? Yah, forget it, I was on crack.