From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fall-curlleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net (fall-curlleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD8368A42 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:03:29 +1100 (EST) Received: from pop-savannah.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.69]) by fall-curlleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EyWee-00016J-HM for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:52:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop linuxppc64-dev From: Hollis Blanchard To: Olaf Hering In-Reply-To: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> References: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:52:11 -0600 Message-Id: <1137426731.22151.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 13:12 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > Everything is merged into arch/powerpc now. > Stop cross-posting. > --- linux-2.6.15-olh.orig/MAINTAINERS > +++ linux-2.6.15-olh/MAINTAINERS > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ S: Supported > BROADBAND PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE > P: Arnd Bergmann > M: arnd@arndb.de > -L: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org > +L: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > W: http://linuxppc64.org > S: Supported Are you suggesting that nobody should ever use linuxppc64-dev now? If so, patching MAINTAINERS doesn't seem like the right way to enforce that. Do we want to think about merging the mailing lists? Both seem fairly high-volume right now (compare http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc64-dev/ and http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/). linuxppc-embedded is separate. There are certainly lots of emails and patches that are common to both 32- and 64-bit, though... The subscriber lists don't overlap 100%, but the difference might be small enough not to matter to many people. -Hollis