From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hollis@penguinppc.org>
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A786893D
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:06:30 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop linuxppc64-dev
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@penguinppc.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060118120715.GB19765@suse.de>
References: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> <20060118110905.GA23678@krypton>
	<20060118120715.GB19765@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:48:08 -0600
Message-Id: <1137599288.10689.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:07 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>  On Wed, Jan 18, Arthur Othieno wrote:
> 
> > What about the s/linuxppc64\.org/penguinppc\.org/g case? Or is
> > penguinppc64.org preferable? Or am I just taking it too far? ;)
> 
> They are redirected on DNS or HTTP level.

HTTP level, but that doesn't answer his question.

As the maintainer of that site, I would prefer to remove the
linuxppc64.org reference.

-Hollis