* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: restore eeh_add_device_late() prototype [not found] <20060301001909.GU20175@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> @ 2006-03-01 1:02 ` Mark Fasheh 2006-03-01 16:35 ` [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() John Rose 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mark Fasheh @ 2006-03-01 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paulus, johnrose; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Sigh, I forgot to actually CC linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, and I also left off my signed-off-by line (added below). Sorry about that. On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:19:09PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: A search on the linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev mailing lists and the git tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc didn't show this issue fixed or reported. If I missed something please ignore :) I get a compile failure trying to build a powerpc kernel: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c: In function `eeh_add_device_tree_late': arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c:901: warning: implicit declaration of function `eeh_add_device_late' arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c: At top level: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c:918: error: conflicting types for 'eeh_add_device_late' arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c:901: error: previous implicit declaration of 'eeh_add_device_late' was here make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.o] Error 1 It seems commit 827c1a6c1a5dcb2902fecfb648f9af6a532934eb removed this prototype from eeh.h. The following patch restores it. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/eeh.h b/include/asm-powerpc/eeh.h index 7dfb408..4250fa1 100644 --- a/include/asm-powerpc/eeh.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/eeh.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void __init pci_addr_cache_build(void); */ void eeh_add_device_early(struct device_node *); void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct device_node *); +void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *); void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *); /** @@ -117,6 +118,8 @@ static inline void pci_addr_cache_build( static inline void eeh_add_device_early(struct device_node *dn) { } +static inline void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *dev) { } + static inline void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { } static inline void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct device_node *dn) { } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() 2006-03-01 1:02 ` [PATCH] powerpc: restore eeh_add_device_late() prototype Mark Fasheh @ 2006-03-01 16:35 ` John Rose 2006-03-01 17:59 ` Mark Fasheh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: John Rose @ 2006-03-01 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Fasheh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml Good catch, Mark. Commit 827c1a6c1a5dcb2902fecfb648f9af6a532934eb introduced a new function that calls eeh_add_device_late() implicitly. This patch reorders the two functions in question to fix the compile error. This might be preferable to exposing eeh_add_device_late() in eeh.h. Apologies Paul/everyone, please don't kill me. Thanks- John Signed-off-by: John Rose <johnrose@austin.ibm.com> diff -puN arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c~fix_eeh_bb arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c --- 2_6_linus_3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c~fix_eeh_bb 2006-03-01 10:30:52.000000000 -0600 +++ 2_6_linus_3-johnrose/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c 2006-03-01 10:31:28.000000000 -0600 @@ -893,20 +893,6 @@ void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct de } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_tree_early); -void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - struct pci_dev *dev; - - list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { - eeh_add_device_late(dev); - if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) { - struct pci_bus *subbus = dev->subordinate; - if (subbus) - eeh_add_device_tree_late(subbus); - } - } -} - /** * eeh_add_device_late - perform EEH initialization for the indicated pci device * @dev: pci device for which to set up EEH @@ -935,6 +921,20 @@ void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_late); +void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_dev *dev; + + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { + eeh_add_device_late(dev); + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) { + struct pci_bus *subbus = dev->subordinate; + if (subbus) + eeh_add_device_tree_late(subbus); + } + } +} + /** * eeh_remove_device - undo EEH setup for the indicated pci device * @dev: pci device to be removed _ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() 2006-03-01 16:35 ` [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() John Rose @ 2006-03-01 17:59 ` Mark Fasheh 2006-03-01 18:57 ` John Rose 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mark Fasheh @ 2006-03-01 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Rose; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:35:55AM -0600, John Rose wrote: > Good catch, Mark. Heh, thanks. > Commit 827c1a6c1a5dcb2902fecfb648f9af6a532934eb introduced a new > function that calls eeh_add_device_late() implicitly. This patch > reorders the two functions in question to fix the compile error. This > might be preferable to exposing eeh_add_device_late() in eeh.h. Hmm, you still left the EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeh_add_device_late) and you didn't make eeh_add_device_late() static. Shouldn't you do that if you don't want to make it accessible outside of eeh.c? --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() 2006-03-01 17:59 ` Mark Fasheh @ 2006-03-01 18:57 ` John Rose 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: John Rose @ 2006-03-01 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Fasheh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, lkml > Hmm, you still left the EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeh_add_device_late) and you didn't > make eeh_add_device_late() static. Shouldn't you do that if you don't want > to make it accessible outside of eeh.c? > --Mark Again, good points. Ever have one of those days? Take 2. Commit 827c1a6c1a5dcb2902fecfb648f9af6a532934eb introduced a new function that calls eeh_add_device_late() implicitly. This patch reorders the two functions in question to fix the compile error. This might be preferable to exposing eeh_add_device_late() in eeh.h. Thanks- John Signed-off-by: John Rose <johnrose@austin.ibm.com> diff -puN arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c~fix_eeh_bb arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c --- 2_6_linus_3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c~fix_eeh_bb 2006-03-01 10:30:52.000000000 -0600 +++ 2_6_linus_3-johnrose/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c 2006-03-01 12:54:03.000000000 -0600 @@ -893,20 +893,6 @@ void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct de } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_tree_early); -void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - struct pci_dev *dev; - - list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { - eeh_add_device_late(dev); - if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) { - struct pci_bus *subbus = dev->subordinate; - if (subbus) - eeh_add_device_tree_late(subbus); - } - } -} - /** * eeh_add_device_late - perform EEH initialization for the indicated pci device * @dev: pci device for which to set up EEH @@ -914,7 +900,7 @@ void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci * This routine must be used to complete EEH initialization for PCI * devices that were added after system boot (e.g. hotplug, dlpar). */ -void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *dev) +static void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *dev) { struct device_node *dn; struct pci_dn *pdn; @@ -933,7 +919,20 @@ void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev pci_addr_cache_insert_device (dev); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_late); + +void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_dev *dev; + + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { + eeh_add_device_late(dev); + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) { + struct pci_bus *subbus = dev->subordinate; + if (subbus) + eeh_add_device_tree_late(subbus); + } + } +} /** * eeh_remove_device - undo EEH setup for the indicated pci device _ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-01 19:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20060301001909.GU20175@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
2006-03-01 1:02 ` [PATCH] powerpc: restore eeh_add_device_late() prototype Mark Fasheh
2006-03-01 16:35 ` [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late() John Rose
2006-03-01 17:59 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-01 18:57 ` John Rose
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).