From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from over.co.us.ibm.com (over.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "over.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45563679EF for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:07:01 +1100 (EST) Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([9.56.232.143]) by bldfb.esmtp.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2UFgEPg020083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:42:14 -0500 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2UFfxTa026994 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:41:59 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k2UFfno9227260 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:41:49 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2UFfmLH019106 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:41:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change H_StudlyCaps to H_SHOUTING_CAPS From: Ryan Arnold To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <20060330115817.ADB99211AE9@Schermpje.local> References: <20060330115817.ADB99211AE9@Schermpje.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:36:39 -0600 Message-Id: <1143733000.14254.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 13:58 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > [I hope I got my mailer script to work okay, don't kill me please.] > > Also cleans up some nearby whitespace problems. > > Signed-of-by: Segher Boessenkool > - else if (rc == H_Parameter) > + "plpar-hcall (%s) failed; not authorized to this" > + " function\n", tag); > + else if (rc == H_PARAMETER) > printk(KERN_INFO "plpar-hcall (%s) failed; Bad parameter(s)\n", > tag); I believe the studly caps were used over shouting caps because the RPA specification, from which these ret codes were taken, uses Studly Caps. That probably isn't sufficient justification, just an historical perspective. -- Ryan S. Arnold IBM Linux Technology Center Linux on Power Toolchain