From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net (viper.oldcity.dca.net [216.158.38.4]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 122F9679E2 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 00:59:51 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] [RFC] alsa integer control ranges From: Lee Revell To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1147780945.29795.110.camel@johannes> References: <1147780945.29795.110.camel@johannes> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:53:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1147791186.13948.109.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , ALSA development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:02 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Apparently all alsa userspace programs including alsamixer suck. Hence, > this patch is required to make them work properly. Why is it so hard to > do these additions/subtractions in the program or maybe even in the alsa > library? The alsa libraries already think they know better and mess up > all kinds of things. > > What are your opinions on this? Should this be required? And if so, why > do we even have the value.integer.min when we can't use it anyway? > > The code this patch applies against is in > http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/snd-aoa.git/ but that isn't all too > relevant, the patch serves just as an illustration of what is wrong > here. > Ummm... what problem is this patch fixing? Lee