From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C7C67A76 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 11:18:04 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1148553785.11759.12.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1148553785.11759.12.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:17:48 +1000 Message-Id: <1148606268.8089.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , debian-powerpc List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Once I have all these, I will, along with submitting snd-aoa [2], submit > a patch to snd-powermac that makes it refuse loading in presence of a > layout-id property as a first step to migrate to snd-aoa. > > At the same time, I'll probably make i2sbus refuse attaching to a device > unless there's a layout-id property so that it doesn't claim devices aoa > doesn't handle yet. I think we need to be careful about a couple other things: - We need non-pmf GPIO. Some layout-id based machines do need that, like the mac mini - I'm tempted to rename soundbus/i2sbus to snd-aoa-soundbus and snd-aoa-i2sbus (at least the module names) for now. Ben.