From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD6F67B28 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:22:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/10 v2] Add the MPC8641 HPCN platform files. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Zhang Wei-r63237 In-Reply-To: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673069759E4@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD4673069759E4@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:22:36 +1000 Message-Id: <1150086156.11798.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jon Loeliger List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Re-ordering the interrupt is just fit for the practice from MPC85xx platform > and legacy OpenPIC interrupts order. We put 16 i8259 interrupts to first 0-15 > Position, 48 MPC86xx processor internel interrupts to 16-63 and 16 MPC86xx > External interrupts to 64-79. I'd rather keep the openpic sources in a single row then... with the new stuff that I'm trying to finish in time for 2.6.18 (well... maybe), re-numbering will be handled for you by the core and 8259 will always have 0...15 reserved. Ben.