From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdub.homelinux.org (71-36-219-11.roch.qwest.net [71.36.219.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9967A63 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:10:23 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc-genirq: Use generic_handle_irq() From: Josh Boyer To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1150170472.13958.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1150170472.13958.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:51:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1150195883.5618.6.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 13:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > This patch updates the ppc and powerpc architectures to use the new > generic_handle_irq() so that interrupt controllers can be ported to the > new genirq layer. It does? I only see arch/powerpc in the patch. Is arch/ppc hiding somewhere else? And yes, arch/ppc still exists. We can debate that later ;). josh