From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735267B2A for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 02:15:44 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: 32 bit userland on G5 From: David Woodhouse To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1150214746.6305.3.camel@johannes> References: <1150194348.9208.33.camel@johannes> <1150202709.12423.21.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1150214746.6305.3.camel@johannes> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:15:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1150215340.2844.33.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 18:05 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Yeah, I was just thinking that there are programs relying on that and if > they run in the 32-bit compat mode they might rightfully do so... Dunno. Nah. It isn't a valid assumption; just as it isn't valid to assume that your stack will _always_ be at about 0xbfffffff. -- dwmw2