From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB66D67B3C for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:25:04 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc-genirq: Use generic_handle_irq() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <1150202794.29294.5.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> References: <1150170472.13958.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150195883.5618.6.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <1150202394.12423.16.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1150202794.29294.5.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:20:03 +1000 Message-Id: <1150240803.13958.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Ingo Molnar , David Woodhouse , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 07:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 13:39 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 05:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > It does? I only see arch/powerpc in the patch. Is arch/ppc hiding > > > somewhere else? > > > > > > And yes, arch/ppc still exists. We can debate that later ;). > > > > Did a maintainer step forward for it yet? > > For arch/ppc? Not that I'm aware of. But that wasn't particularly my > point. The email says "This patch updates the ppc and powerpc > architectures..." when it doesn't. It does, check again :) Ben.